Category Archives: news

May 5 Xenia City Community Schools Bond Levy Ballot Text

The following is the text of the $79.95 million bond issue that will put Xenia homeowners and wage earners up-to-their-ears in more debt. The average amount of debt each household will share is about $3,300. For the same amount, every homeowner could be driving a new Mazda or Nissan Altima. Okay, they would have to convince the dealership to lease for 28 years. Because we are in a terrible recession, a dealership just might. I bet you a Pontiac dealer would.

Anyway, the official bond issue ballot is as follows:

A Majority Affirmative Vote Is Necessary For Passage.

Shall the Xenia Community City School District, Greene and Warren Counties, Ohio be authorized to do the following:

(1) Issue bonds for the purpose of constructing school facilities under the State of Ohio Classroom Facilities Assistance Program and related facilities, including science and technology labs and community meeting space; renovating, improving and constructing additions to existing facilities; furnishing and equipping the same, including enhanced safety and security devices; improving the sites thereof; and acquiring land and interests in land, in the principal amount of $79,950,000, to be repaid annually over a maximum period of twenty-eight (28) years, and levy a property tax outside the ten mill limitation, estimated by the county auditor to average over the bond repayment period seven and forty hundredths (7.40) mills for each one dollar of tax valuation, which amounts to seventy-four ($0.74) cents for each one hundred dollars of tax valuation, commencing in 2009, first due in calendar year 2010, to pay the annual debt charges on the bonds, and to pay debt charges on any notes issued in anticipation of those bonds?

(2) Levy an additional property tax to provide for permanent improvements for the School District at a rate not exceeding one half (0.50) mills for each one dollar of tax valuation, which amounts to $0.05 for each one hundred dollars of tax valuation, for a continuing period of time, commencing in 2009, first due in calendar year 2010?

FOR THE BOND ISSUE AND TAX LEVY

AGAINST THE BOND ISSUE AND TAX LEVY

Pros & Cons:

Surely, you have read the expensive four-color sales brochure that was delivered to every Xenia household compliments of the school board. In case your color blind, it consists of blues, yellows, and reds. There is also green. Oh, you missed that color! It’s the color of lot of money. To prove it, let me quote from the school administrator’s 10 page sales brochure.

“Well its our turn now, Xenia, to take our share of the State money–near $58 million–to revitalize our schools and communities.” (p.2)

The proposed $79.95 million bond issue “is fairer because it extends for 28 years–meaning future generations will have to pay their rightful share.” (p.2)

To pay for our school that the State has determined we need, the Ohio School Facilities Commission (OSFC) “is offering a 48 percent off sale–we pay 52 percent and they pay 48 percent–for new schools.” (p.2)

There you have it a sale no community experiencing a severe economic recession could possibly pass up. Yes, you must buy into it today for three reasons: (1) Building new schools will create new jobs (p.3); (2) the building might crumble to the ground and blow away (pp.3,6); and (3) because it is inevitable anyway, you can pay now or you Will Pay Later (p.4).

Could the pros be conning taxpayers?

Everyone knows new schools will create new jobs for Xenia. You will notice that those construction jobs are temporary jobs. Some Xenia resident might get hired by out-of-town contractors. Because investment advisers and some economists predict the recession will continue beyond 2010, those jobs might help a few for a while. What Xenia really needs is more businesses that pay more local residents a good income on a long-term basis.

The school administrators’ sales pitch does present some truth. New schools would provide a better environment, but here is the problem: the new plan is like the old plan. The primary objective of both old and new is not better education but getting the state’s money extorted from tobacco companies.

Although I’m not a bleeding heart for large corporations, taking $58 million of such funds obtained by extortion is to support state crime.

I used to smoke a pack or two of cigarettes a day. Written on every pack was a warning that inhaling might have harmful consequences. Everyone I knew was aware of someone who had died of cancer or some other disease caused by consuming tobacco products. We all exercised our freedom by choosing to risk getting ill and possibly dying. Anyone employed in making the stuff know the risks as well. The tobacco companies didn’t deceive or coerce us or anyone else into consuming or making their products. Consequently, the state extorted money from the tobacco companies, and it’s being justified by helping pay for public education.

Once everyone is beholding to a corrupt state no one will have a legitimate right to complain about greater state injustices or crimes.

Once everyone is beholding to a corrupt state no one will have a legitimate right to complain about greater state injustices or crimes. The $58 million sales is like buying from the mafia on credit–Guido may one day come to collect and probably some additional interest not agreed upon. If you don’t pay up, Guido will hurt you. Giving up our freedom to tyrants will not end well either.

Unless, more new schools are built to accommodate the children living in our community’s new housing areas, all Xenia families and children will get is new ineffective schools. That is what studies of many school districts around the nation have proven. Small neighborhood schools are the most effective structure and organization of schools. That is exactly what the Xenia plan still does not do. In order to get the state’s extorted money, school administrator plan on combining schools. School research from around the nations provide ample evidence that the best learning environments are not just school with small classes but also schools under 350 students, which is mentioned in Ohio law.

Xenia doesn’t need the state’s extortion money. Our community built the current schools by raising our taxes as needed. The one of the primary reasons for the Ohio School Facilities Commission is to assist with capital funding for the needier communities. OSFC will have funding available after the recession is over. It may not be as large a pool of money they extorted from tobacco companies, but it will exist all the same.

See also my research on the subject:
Xenia Community Schools Rebuilding Plan : What I Learned at the Forum
Xenia Community Schools Rebuilding Plan : Why Small Schools are Best
Xenia Community Schools Rebuilding Plan : It’s All About the Money

Swine Flu Virus Reaches Ohio Via Biological Attack?

The deadly swine flu virus hitched a ride in a 9 year old boy from Lorain, Ohio. The boy had returned from a trip to Mexico with his family. They had traveled all over Mexico including a visit to a farm.

The virus is new strain combined of strains from North America, Europe, and Asia. The unique combination has led some to speculate about the possible biological attach.

Contrary to some spectacular news reporting, the swine flu virus is not new to North America. There have been minor outbreaks of this type of flu since the early 1900s. It is contracted usually by contact with infected pigs or people. As in this case, it was probably spread by birds that inflected pigs that was passed on to humans. This is a more unusual outbreak because it is being widely spread from humans to humans. It is spread by sneezing, coughing, and the like. Therefore, it should be deemed unusual.

Nevertheless, the unanswered question raising speculation that terrorism may be a factor is why is it more severe and deadly in Mexico than in America? Another question not raised is why did it happen around the same time of President Obama’s visit to Mexico?

Rep. Martin speaking at the JBS Freedom Campaign meeting on April 30

Representative Jarrod Martin, state representative district 70 will be attending the meetup Thursday April 30th to speak to the group about the bill he sponsor’d, HCR 11 The Ohio State Sovereignty Resolution ( http://sovereign.ohiofreedom.com/wordpress/ ). Rep. Martin will discuss this and other issues going on at the state level and be available for questions as well. I hope everyone can attend. Please bring someone with you. Additonal details here: http://jbs.meetup.com/107/calendar/10052324/?success=event_edit_short&eventAction=editing

NY Times Cuts More Sections

By Don Irvine

With ad revenue and circulation shrinking The New York Times announced that they are chopping The City section and including the material in a Sunday metro report to save millions of dollars.

From the New York Observer Bill Keller made it official moments ago:

The City section, the regionals and the Escapes section will be eliminated as stand-alone sections in The Times.

Instead, they’ll just use material that may have appeared in those sections in a Sunday metro report.

“We will consolidate Sunday Metro area coverage in a new Sunday feature section, which will be a showcase for news and features from the city and beyond. (Metro area breaking news will be incorporated into the A-book.),” he wrote in a memo this morning. “The new section will include zoned pages for Connecticut, New Jersey, Westchester and Long Island. Joe Sexton and Jodi Rudoren have taken on the project of developing a prototype, and we hope to launch the new section on May 24, replacing the City section and regional weeklies.”

I think Keller and company have forgotten that on the front page of the Times is the slogan “All the News That’s Fit to Print.” Maybe they should change that to “All the News That We Can Afford to Print.”

Source: Boycott The New York Times, April 17, 2009

Ohio House Approves Gov. Strickland’s Politically Correct Outcome-Based Education Plan

Last week, the Ohio House of Representatives finalized its revisions of Gov. Strickland’s evidence-based school funding reform.

According to a recent AP report,

Strickland proposed a dramatic overhaul of Ohio’s school funding formula that would boost the state’s share of the cost and reduce what taxpayers are expected to contribute to their local schools. His proposed “evidence-based” education system would require schools to use programs based on research findings and would set standards for students, teachers and districts. Districts would be audited annually and could be shut down for repeated failure to meet academic and operating standards.

The evidence-based system is the same as the outcome-based system that was defeat the last time it was proposed. This version coincides somewhat with “No Child Left Behind” requirements. The main issue with the proposed system is its inclusion of politically-correct attitude, feeling and behavioral outcomes. This may also be called mind-control or brainwashing for good secularist citizenship. If 80% of Ohioans are religious, an additional 80% of Ohio children will be made good practical atheists. That is something evolutionists like Richard Dawkins, Strickland, and followers would gleefully approve.

Despite the changes made by the House, Rep. Stephen Dyer, chairman of the budget subcommittee on primary and secondary schools, said the essence of Strickland’s “evidence-based” is still intact.

The following are some of the more significant changes mentioned in the AP report.

  • Extending implementation from eight years to 10 years.
  • Increasing base teacher salary from $45,000 to $49,914.
  • Capping growth in state aid at 1.9 percent a year, compared with the 15 percent and 16 percent Strickland had proposed.
  • Giving the state six years, rather than two, to pick up a larger share of local school costs.
  • Allowing districts more flexibility in how soon they start new initiatives such as lowering student-teacher ratios, lengthening the school year, and implementing all-day kindergarten.

Raising the pay scale of teachers is a good thing, but don’t let it be a distraction from the real issue. As noted above, the state plans to control local education. If the Left achieves this goal, the plan of world socialists (the Left) will be complete. That means Capitol Hill politicians will ultimately control all schooling, and in the end the United Nations will dictate the content and structure of American schooling.

If you think the above is preposterous, then consider this: the federal government now owns American financial businesses, they recent passed universal health care (medial socialism), our welfare economy is based on Marxist socialism, and American education is now within their reach. The goal of NAFTA is to create a North American Union according to United Nations plans. Many of the federal leaders approve of the global currency discussed at the last G20 summit.

As Professor Economics Charlotte Twight explained in her book Dependent On D.C., the federal government has every intention to bring Ohio education under its total control. Gov. Strickland is a member of the Capitol Hill club seeking to achieve the goals of the Left.

Xenia 3.5 Mill Operating Levy Renewal Coming Soon

It appears that Xenia management and our Council representatives got the message during the February 2009 election. By a large majority, Xenia voters defeated an effort to pass a very large 5.0 mill operating levy replacement levy increase. The annual revenue it would have generated ($1.86 million) was way beyond any perceivable need.

Instead of seeking the next highest amount possible (3.5 mill replacement), the Council has decided to take the “What Works” approach. During the March 26, 2009 meeting, management seem to have decided that Council should initiate the process that will put the 3.5 Mill Operating Levy Renewal on the August 4, 2009 ballot. That they did.

Council could have saved taxpayer $18,000 had they sought for a renewal in the first place. Because the cost of placing a levy up for a vote is the above amount, the renewal will now cost taxpayers $36,000.

By the way, Councilman Dale Louderback was the only member who has refused to accept anything other than a renewal. Why was he the only dissenting voice against the February levy? Apparently, his conscience would not permit him to ask voters for such a huge increase during our nation’s near depression-like economic crisis. He is fully behind the no-new-taxes operating levy renewal.

One last observation; I can only imagine the distaste that observant Jews by that ancient priestly name, Levy or Levi, must have towards our politically and sometimes greed motivated government levies.

Economic Stimulus Funding Xenia Capital Improvements (but Not Jobs)

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Economic Stimulus) was approved by the House and Senate on February 13, 2009. According to the Recovery.gov web site, the goal of the Economic Stimulus is to jumpstart the economy, create or save jobs, and put a down payment on addressing long-neglected challenges so our country can thrive in the 21st century.

How does the economic stimulus flow to communities like Xenia?

The money flows similar to the way federal money is disbursed, which is through the State of Ohio, then to local communities. The Governor’s Office has set up a website whereby communities and other entities can submit projects. Xenia, like many other cities submitted a wide range of projects that included street reconstruction, street extension, water line construction, park development and redevelopment, downtown streetscape, pedestrian and bicycle improvement and extension, retention of police manpower and high speed internet connection. The projects that were submitted to the Governor’s Office are then reviewed by the different State Departments. Projects that are considered “shovel ready” get priority funding.

Projects that have received funding in Xenia.

The Ohio Department of Transportation was the first Department to review and take action on project proposal. These projects were reviewed through the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission (MVRPC). This agency made recommendations on which projects to submit. The transportation and street enhancement related projects that were approved in Xenia include:

1. Innovation Way Road Extension – $2,267,551.00. This is located in a new industrial complex between Union Road and S.R. 380. The first phase of Innovation Way is currently being constructed. Economic Stimulus dollars will fund $2,267,551.00 of the $3,209,681 project cost.

2. East Main Street Streetscape Improvement between Whiteman Street and Collier Street – $209,348.00. This project involves replacement of trees, installation of ornamental lighting, replacement of sidewalks, curbs, installation of crosswalks and accessible ramps and provision of streetscape hardware like benches, trash receptacles, planters and banners.

3. Bicycle and Pedestrian Crossing Improvement from Xenia Station Hub to the Ohio-Erie Trail – $51,123.00. This involves improving the crosswalk with proper pavement marking, re-orienting of existing accessible ramps, widening of existing sidewalks on the east side of South Detroit Street between Hill Street and Washington Street and replacement of the catch basin with a storm manhole.

I could think of better ways to pay for those improvements to our city than to give Capitol Hill more reason to think in terms of ownership.

Source: Xenia Development Corner Newsletter, March 2009.

Wondering what is being built next to Applebee’s Restuarant?

If you guessed it was another restaurant, you get a big fat A for Accurate-guessing.

According to the latest Xenia Development Corner Newsletter, Bob Evans Restaurant has started constructing their second restaurant at 1981 Harner Drive. This particular building design is being unveiled in Xenia and will be the first of many they hope to build throughout this region. The new restaurant is going to be over 5,000 square feet, roughly the same size as the existing Bob Evans Restaurant on 400 West Main Street.

According to Bob Evans Restaurant Officials, the two restaurants will initially be maintained and operated for a while. Eventually, the one on West Main Street will be closed.

What is the City of Xenia Home Repair Program?

Now that spring has sprung in Xenia. Homeowners are beginning to think about repairing the home. The current dilemma is money. Not that money isn’t always an issue, but many pocket books are experiencing the effects of the economic recession. The most affected are likely to be the low- and moderate income homeowners. Those who are may find some financial assistance in Xenia’s Home Repair Program.

The Home Repair Program is a grant program that helps low-moderate income homeowners to repair housing conditions that pose an immediate threat to the health and safety of the occupants, or pose an ongoing threat to the structural integrity of the home.

The program offers up to $8,000 for single item repairs such as roofs, gutters and downspouts, windows and doors, electrical, plumbing heating, insulation, foundations, bathroom upgrades, water heaters, handicapped accessibility repairs and more.

To qualify for a Home Repair grant, you must meet the following criteria:

1. You must be the owner of the home (not a renter) in the City of Xenia.

2. You must live in the home as your permanent residence.

3. Your home must be in need of health, safety or emergency repairs not      exceeding $8,000.

4. You must be income eligibility requirements.

Financial eligibility is based on maximum income. For example, the maximum income limit for a household of 1 is $33,700, for a household of 2 it is $38,500, for a household of 3 it is $43,300, the maximum income limit for a household of 4 is $48,100, and so on.

To find out more about the program, visit the Xenia Home Repair Program website or call 937-562-5007.

Parental Rights Amendment

The Parental Rights Amendment (H.J.Res. 42) today has 73 sponsors in the House and 2 in the Senate. Is your members of Congress among them? The short answer is no. Either they are not aware of this amendment or helping business make money is more important.

The question is whether parents deserve Constitutional protection of their rights and authority over their own children. Many believe American families should be governed by secular U.N. law. That is what Pres. Obama, Hilary Clinton, and most other socialist Democrats believe is best for us all. Maybe you don’t agree with them. The Parental Rights.org certainly doesn’t. The following is the argument not only against the Democrat socialists but also showing the need for the Parental Rights Amendment.

“Eighty years ago the Supreme Court declared that “the child is not the mere creature of the State; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.” Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925).

Thirty years ago the Court continued this line of reasoning with the pronouncement that the “primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition.” Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).

Yet in 2000, when the State of Washington gave any person the ability to override a good parent’s decision about visitation by simply claiming that it would be “best” for children to allow the third-party to have visitation rights, in the Supreme Court:

There were six separate opinions and none reached a five-vote majority:

  • Justice Thomas was the only Justice to clearly state that parental rights receive the same high legal standard of protection as other fundamental rights
  • Justice Scalia held that parents have no constitutionally protected rights whatsoever
  • Support for a high-view of parental rights has been seriously undermined by the current Court.

As a consequence, numerous lower federal courts refuse to treat parental rights as deserving of protection as a fundamental right.

At the same time, America is poised to adopt the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. President Obama supports this treaty. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been a leading advocate of this treaty for over twenty years. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) has “promised” that this treaty will be ratified during this term of Congress.

If this treaty is ratified:

  • The laws of all 50 states on children and parents would be superseded by this international law by virtue of a specific provision of the US Constitution which expressly declares treaties to be supreme over state law. Virtually all law on children and parents is state law.
  • Good parents would no longer be entitled to the legal presumption that they act in the best interests of their children. Instead, the government would have the authority to overrule all parents on any decision concerning the child if the government believed it could make a better decision.
  • Parents could no longer spank their children.
  • Children would have the legal right to choose their own religion.
    Parents would be permitted only to give advice.
  • America would be under a binding legal obligation to massively increase its federal spending on children’s programs.

The only kind of law that can override a treaty is the Constitution of the United States. State laws or state constitutions cannot override treaties. There is no guarantee that federal statutes could override treaties—moreover, we enter a binding legal promise to obey a treaty when we ratify it. America should not promise to obey a treaty and then claim it is appropriate to obey the treaty only when we want to. America of all nations must respect the rule of law.

There is only one possible solution for the eroding support for parental rights in the Supreme Court that can also stop the encroachment of international law.

We need to place the time-honored test of parental rights, as recognized by the Supreme Court for over seventy years, into the explicit text of the Constitution.

We cannot wait until our rights are formally demolished. We must act now to stop international law and protect these two key principles:

  • Fit parents should be allowed to direct the upbringing of their children.
  • American legislators, not international tribunals, should make the public policy for America on families and children.

Asking your Representatives and Senators to support this amendment is one way parents and friends of parents can help the cause.