Category Archives: taxes

Buckeye Institute Releases Educational Ad On Government Compensation and Taxes

(Columbus, OH) The Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions released an educational ad highlighting the funding crisis in local governments due to gold-plated government compensation packages that will require higher taxes on declining property values unless compensations are realigned to reflect current revenues. The educational ad will run on Wednesday, August 24, and Thursday, August 25, in the twenty-two Suburban News Publications in Central Ohio reaching 250,000 homes.

With privates sector Ohioans losing roughly 500,000 net jobs over the last eleven years, the decline in home values further undermines the ability of Ohioans to afford the gold-plated compensation packages of government. By highlighting the deficits of nineteen Central Ohio school districts as projected by those school districts in October 2010 (prior to the 2012-2013 state budget and the cuts therein) along with the amount of revenue that will be swallowed by compensation packages, the educational ad highlights the lack of accountability on gold-plated government compensation packages.

For example, based on the October 2010 projections by the school districts, from 2008-2015, the nineteen school districts finished the school year with deficits in 113 out of 152 years, or 74 percent of the time. To eliminate these yearly deficits, the school districts raided their rainy days funds. In eighteen out of nineteen school districts, unless compensation packages are realigned or taxes raised, the rainy day funds will be totally drained by 2015, leaving Central Ohio school districts with an aggregated deficit of nearly $1 billion.

More critical, because compensation packages absorb nearly all revenues (97%), taxpayers are left with two choices: raise taxes on themselves as their homes lose value or realign compensation packages to reflect the revenue already provided to government. As small and medium-sized businesses struggle to grow, additional taxes on them and their employees, as echoed by Gary James, CEO of Reynoldsburg-based Dynalab and twice named Entrepreneur of the Year, won’t make it easier to expand in this tough economy.

“The confluence of tax hike requests by local governments, largely due to compensation package costs, and declining home values will require homeowners to make a stark choice,” said Matt Mayer, Buckeye Institute President, “This educational ad and the one-stop-shop webpage will help them make an informed choice. Ohioans cannot sustain higher taxes and the status quo of less accountability.” The Buckeye Institute plans to run similar educational ads in the other large suburban cities across Ohio over the next month. The educational ad and accompanying chart with fiscal data is attached.

The one-stop-shop webpage can be viewed at www.buckeyeinstitute.org/getthefacts.

Gov. Kaisch Delivers Weekly Republican Address: Ohio’s Finanical Reforms to Federal Government

Delivering last week’s Republican address, Govenor Kaisch commends Ohio’s success in reigning in it large budget deficit without raising taxes. Kaisch encourged the Obama administration and Congress to pass the upcoming federal balanced budget amendment.

The passage of this amendment will ensure our national government practices better fiscal discipline. It will also help stabilize the economy and stimulate business growth.

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQ2drkSXSkA&hl=en&fs=1&]

Ohio Left Behind

Last week was the beginning of a sales tax holiday for nearly 34% of all states. Those states include Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma,South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia with Connecticut, Florida, Massachusetts, Maryland, and Texas to soon follow.

Notice, Ohio is not among those states enjoying the sales tax holiday. Why?

I’m pretty sure there are a lot of Ohio parents who would appreciate not contributing an additional 7% or so for sending their children back to schools with new clothes and school supplies. After all, a state that makes parent pay taxes for schools, for school supplies, and for school lunch programs at gun point could at least give them a tax holiday during this important season.

Raising Debt Limit Pushes Voters to Frustration Limit

By Gary Palmer

While Republicans and Democrats have thus far accomplished nothing in regard to the debt limit, one thing they have succeeded in doing is raising the frustration limit for millions of Americans.

American voters are accustomed to political drama and gamesmanship in Washington and, for the most part, have largely ignored it at election time. The emergence of the Tea Party movement in April 2009 was the first evidence that voters were fed up enough to organize against the political establishment in both parties. This new level of frustration among voters was displayed by the impact of the Tea Party in the 2010 election.

So while Congress and President Obama have failed to do anything about the debt limit, recent polls indicate they have certainly succeeded in raising the public’s frustration limit to an all-time high. New polling data now indicates that deadlock over the debt limit and the failure to enact sensible cuts in government spending have turned public opinion against Obama, as well as the Democrats and the Republicans in Congress.

The Pew Research Center poll released on July 28th reported that only 41 percent of all registered voters say they want Obama to be re-elected, a ten-point drop since May. Among critical independent voters, there has been a steep drop-off in support for him, with only 31 percent supporting his reelection. In fact, among independent voters, a generic Republican candidate holds an eight-point advantage.

Public frustration is even worse when it comes to Congress.

According to a July 27th Gallup daily tracking poll, 41 percent approve of the way Obama has handled the negotiations to raise the federal debt limit, while only 31 percent approve of the way Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner has handled it and only 23 percent approve of Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s efforts. In fact, the only good news for Republicans is that even at 48 percent, Boehner’s disapproval rate is lower than the 52 percent disapproval rating of the President and Harry Reid. Interestingly, only 36 percent of Democrats approve of Reid’s handling of the debt limit.

For most voters, there are two things on their minds-excessive government spending and jobs. The outcome of the debate over raising the debt limit affects both. If the debt limit is raised without spending cuts, the U.S. could see its AAA bond rating reduced. This will cost the federal government about $100 billion more in interest costs each year, plus it will also increase the interest costs for consumer credit and mortgages and inflict even more stress on our economy.

According to David Beers, Standard & Poor’s government credit ratings expert, there is a 50-50 chance of a downgrade in our bond rating if there is not a serious agreement on cutting spending. But Obama and the Democrats have thus far refused to agree to any debt limit increase that includes major spending cuts without a major tax increase along with the cuts. They want to add over a trillion dollars in taxes which will further undermine the ability of the economy to create new jobs.

In other words, the Democrats are holding the economy and the nation’s credit rating hostage until their demands for a massive tax increase are met. The problem for the Republicans is that they have been outmaneuvered and are in a lose-lose situation. If they don’t raise the debt limit, the economy will take a hit and the U.S. credit rating could be lowered. If they do raise the limit and don’t get substantial spending cuts in the deal, the economy and credit rating could still take a hit, and politically they will get hammered by their conservative base.

Thus, it appears that both parties and the President have put political gain ahead of what is best for the country despite potentially catastrophic consequences for the American people and even for the financial markets and economies of other nations. In the process, the unfavorable ratings for Obama and both the Democrats and Republicans in Congress are climbing higher by the day.

The truth is that this debacle is the fault of both parties. Both parties have recklessly spent not only our money, but borrowed money as well. And now the American people are reacting with a continuously level of frustration that may not reach its ceiling until the 2012 elections.

Politicians in both parties should take note that campaigning on the hope that voters are only slightly less fed up with your party than they are with the other party is not exactly something incumbent congressmen should hang their political hats on.

Gary Palmer is president of the Alabama Policy Institute, a non-partisan, non-profit research and education organization dedicated to the preservation of free markets, limited government and strong families, which are indispensable to a prosperous society.

Stop Gov. Kaisch from Selling Roads to the Highest Bidder

Don’t let Governor Kasich sell or lease the Ohio turnpike. Why should we pay foreigners for the privilege of riding on our own money-generating highway system that we built and paid for? It is currently earning approximately $250 million a year for Ohio. We would only gain a one-time infusion of additional money to pay current bills that your kids and future generations will be paying for many years to come.

This sale has major functional problems. Previous sales in other states have lessened their ability maintain and care for their roads and has prevented them from implementing needed expansion. This has also curtailed their ability to make proper decisions that affect local businesses.

We will have inadequate control of future toll increases. Indiana mistakenly sold their toll road system to a foreign company. Drivers complain that the prices have doubled over 5 years. The cost to travel the Ohio turnpike today is $15; in just 5 years time your cost could be $30 or more!

Tell Governor Kasich Ohio is NOT for sale!

Americans Want Spending Cut Not Increased to Pay Down National Debt (corrected)

By Daniel Downs

The current debate in Washington over increasing the debt ceiling is one of perspective. The federal government, like the rest of us, spends nearly twice as much as its income. The difference between the bureaucrats and us is many American don’t keep increasing their debt to pay for it. Washington bureaucrats apparently disagrees. Yet, it seems they also believe serious spending cuts are in order.

The confusion may lie in the political rhetoric. Washington bureaucrats want us to believe they believe spending cuts are necessary while they silently increase spending to compensation for the so-called spending cuts. In other words, politicians must raise the debt ceiling again to pay for the increases in spending in order to cut spending that will balance the national accounts. The end result thus will be tax and spend as per plan.

According to a recent Gallup Poll, most Americans would not like the above plan. “Republicans … tilt heavily in favor of reducing the deficit primarily if not exclusively with spending cuts (67%) as opposed to tax increases (3%). Fifty-one percent of independents share that preference. Democrats are most inclined to want equal amounts of spending cuts and tax increases (42%), though more favor a tilt toward spending cuts (33%) than tax increases (20%).”

The problem with the Gallup Poll is the deficit. The deficit is the difference between spending and income. Yet, the underlying problem is not the deficit. It is the continued borrowing to pay on the ever-increasing debt.

And, if Washington Bureaucrats would stop trying to tell us how to spend our money for such things as health care, televisions and light bulbs, the federal government could cut spending by hundreds of millions if not billions. One small example is light bulb regulations. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates a $30 million reduction in federal spending the regulation requiring only the manufacture and consumption of the new squiggle-looking, mercury containing, energy efficient light bulbs were eliminated.

Besides all that, Michelle Bachmann claims the government already has enough revenue to pay on its debt. Her logic is reasonable. The rest of us don’t seek more debt to pay for more debt. We are supposed pay down the debt before get new loans–Treasury I.O.U.s, Fannie Mae backed mortgages, and the like. As the position of those she represents, politicians and their professional cronies must quit trying to spend America’s money it does not have. Such behavior seems to approach something similar to taxation without representation about which the Feds are expert practitioners.

The Price of Being the Enemy

by Gary Palmer

The evidence is undeniable – global warming is now a major problem for practically every person in America, including the people of Alabama. If you don’t believe it, check your monthly utility bill or the price of gasoline to see that global warming is a big problem in terms of what it costs you.

Technically, the problem is not global warming. It began with cooked up statistics that leftist politicians and environmentalists used to push an agenda that will devastate our economy and do nearly nothing to impact the global temperature. A formidable array of politicians and scientists have bought into the proposition that human activity is bad for the planet.

This belief is not new. In their book The First Global Revolution published by the Club of Rome in 1998, authors Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider make the case for using predictions about worldwide environmental catastrophe to force nations to change economic and governing policies.

King and Schneider wrote, “In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together.” They concluded, “All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy is humanity itself.”

Hmmm. Based on that statement it would be logical to conclude that, if people are the enemy, policies that punish people are not necessarily bad as long as the policies can be billed as helping save the environment.

Needless to say, that would not go over well with most Americans who are opposed to such schemes as Cap and Trade. Even though the Cap and Trade bill died in the U.S. Senate last year (after passing in the House), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with the full support of the Obama Administration, is in the process of implementing it anyway. If the EPA succeeds in this effort, the impact on the American economy will be devastating.

A Heritage Foundation analysis of the Cap and Trade bill that passed the U.S. House of Representatives projected that the GDP for the United States would decline by a cumulative $9.4 trillion between 2012 and 2035. Heritage also projected that net job losses would approach 1.9 million by 2012 and could approach 2.5 million by 2035. The irony of the job losses is that they will hit manufacturing and mining particularly hard, eliminating thousands of union jobs.

Additionally, the Tax Foundation projected that the total burden of the Cap and Trade bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in 2009 would cost the average family of four over $1,200 per year. Moreover, this burden is regressive across income levels, consuming a significantly higher percentage of low income households’ income. According to the Tax Foundation, the Cap and Trade bill will cost households in the bottom 20th percentile of household income $617 per year or about 6.2 percent of their income.

Even though the U.S. Senate rejected the Cap and Trade bill, the Obama Administration is using the EPA to implement it anyway and at significant cost to low- to middle-income families. Perhaps as a way to justify new, more costly regulations, the EPA released a report earlier this year claiming that the Clean Air Act of 1990 will avert 230,000 premature deaths and add $2 trillion to our economy by 2020. The estimated economic benefits in the EPA report range from $250 million to $5.7 trillion, making it appear that the estimators could not come up with anything close to what the economic benefit might be, so they split the difference at $2.7 trillion.

Claiming that 230,000 lives were spared a premature death as a result of the EPA’s actions is in the same genre as justifying the billions of dollars wasted with the Stimulus Bill by claiming it saved an unspecified number of jobs. No one can prove that environmental regulations have saved lives any more than it can be proved that implementing cap and trade regulations will save the planet, but we can see the proof of the impact that these regulations are having on our household income.

High utility bills and the price of gasoline are just part of the price you pay for being the enemy.

Gary Palmer is president of the Alabama Policy Institute, a non-partisan, non-profit research and education organization dedicated to the preservation of free markets, limited government and strong families, which are indispensable to a prosperous society.

Creating Jobs

By Congressman Steve Austria

Currently, the national unemployment stands at more than 9 percent, we have experienced 28 months of unemployment above 8 percent, and Ohio’s unemployment is more than 8 percent. In our own communities we have seen these statistics play out on a daily basis. Most of us know of a family member or friend struggling to find work or may know of a local business that has just shut its doors. Many people have lost their homes and a lot of students coming out of college and graduate programs are unable to find the level of gainful employment they are seeking. To put a difficult issue simply, we are facing tough economic times.

June marks the one-year anniversary of this President declaring a “Summer of Recovery.” In my opinion, last summer seemed like anything but a recovery, and this summer is not looking much different. The truth of the matter is that the last Congress failed to deliver on the promises they made to put Americans back to work. We are now faced with a crippling national debt that threatens the ability to help our country stay competitive in the global marketplace.

To jump start our economy and get Americans back to work, we must go in a different direction than where the previous Congress led us. It is time to get America back to what it does best – which is creating, innovating and leading the world. I am committed to taking every possible step to help get our country back on track and Americans back to work, but I will not do it by putting the tab on our children and grandchildren.

Since January, my Republican colleagues and I have worked furiously to cut spending. These funding debates have not been easy, and tough decisions have been made and are still being made. Our philosophy is based on the tried-and-true economic principle that we must stop borrowing and cut spending which will provide more certainty in the private sector and thus grow the economy.

In order to regain the confidence small business owners and entrepreneurs need to hire new workers and expand, we must remove the Washington red tape and the unnecessary, burdensome regulations. We must streamline the tax code and lower the tax rate for businesses and individuals to spur investment back into the economy and encourage growth. Furthermore, it is important that we promote lower energy costs through increased production, have less reliance on foreign oil, and encourage all forms of domestic energy production.

To learn more about our plan to put the economy back on track, please visit www.jobs.gop.gov.

Live Action President Lila Rose On Planned Parenthood Defunding in NC

(RALEIGH) Lila Rose, president of the pro-life youth organization Live Action, issued the following statement yesterday morning on North Carolina’s defunding of Planned Parenthood:

“North Carolina is now the fourth state this year to step up to the plate and ensure that no taxpayer dollars go towards funding the biggest abortion business in America, Planned Parenthood. This corrupt organization is responsible for killing over 332,000 defenseless unborn children each year. Planned Parenthood manipulates women to choose abortion and routinely aids and abets the sexual exploitation and trafficking of young girls. Governors of other states should take note of how Gov. Perdue’s legislature has decisively rejected her veto and realize that the American people do not want to subsidize abortionists.”

Indiana, Kansas, and New Jersey have recently passed laws to prevent taxpayer funds from going to Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood is challenging the Indiana law in federal court, although a federal judge has already denied the abortion business’s request for a temporary injunction.

Over the past four years, Live Action has released undercover videos revealing Planned Parenthood clinics across the country covering up the sexual abuse of children and violating mandatory reporting laws for statutory rape. In February, Live Action released new undercover footage showing 7 Planned Parenthood clinics in 4 states willing to aid and abet the commercial sex trafficking of underage girls. The videos prompted the House of Representatives to vote twice to defund Planned Parenthood of all federal taxpayer subsidies.

“North Carolina joins Indiana, Kansas, and New Jersey in standing up for the rule of law, human rights, and responsible government,” says Rose. “While we wait for Congress to defund Planned Parenthood at the federal level, responsible state governments should do their part to protect women and unborn children and end local public subsidies of this lawless abortion chain.”

To see the videos, visit: liveaction.org/traffick

Ohio Is Mediocre When Comes to Taxing Beer and Its Consumers

Ohio beer drinkers have some good news from the Tax Foundation. In a recent study, the Foundation learned that Ohio is among the mediocre state when it comes to taxes. Out of all 50 states, Ohio excise tax of beer was a meager 18 cents, which earned Ohio the mediocre ranking of 28.

Ohio’s middle-of-the-road beer tax may be the result on only an average number of drinkers among both taxpayer and especially their political representatives. Many Ohioans and their representatives may drink the stuff, but when compared to the nation of drinkers as a whole, the number of Ohio consumers of beer is only average.

Sarah Palin’s state, Alaska, is ranked number #1 in the nation. That means two things: (1) Alaska taxes beer drinkers an outrageous amount of $1.07, the highest in the nation. It seems apparent that Alaskan officials do not even like the taste of beer. They want to dissuade the populace from consuming that stuff.

Only a few cents beyond Alaska is Alabama, Georgia, Hawaii, and South Carolina. Except for Hawaii, I wonder if those southern states were originally prohibitionist. May be the citizenry and their politicians are smarter than others, or maybe they place a much higher value on getting drunk.

At any rate, the state with the lowest excise taxes on beer is Wyoming at 2 cents. That rate is in line with its cowboy history of two bit for a beer. Other states with only a few cents higher taxes include Missouri, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Colorado, and Kentucky.

Now, I’m wondering whether Missouri also keeps with its history of helping the pony express riders numb the pain from saddle sores. I imagine beer is as good as any painkiller. Wisconsin, on the other hand, is considered by some as the modern beer making capital of the United States. They would like to build a pipeline to transport their flammable fuel to every home. Then, there is Colorado known as Rocky Mountain high, which might be beer related but doubtfully so. The two surprises are Pennsylvania and Kentucky. The three things that come to mind about Pennsylvania is the Puritan taste for Rum, the Quakers religion, and the Constitution–not the love of beer. And, Kentucky used to be one of the moonshine states. Maybe Kentuckians traded the gut-rotting moonshine in for the more healthy brain numbing alcoholic beverage.

Ohioans can be glad politicians do not regard beer as a candidate for the sin tax–at least not yet.