Tag Archives: jobs

Lear: State government on the wrong path to balanced budget

Ohio lost another opportunity to show its true strength last Thursday as state government failed again to balance its budget with Ohio resources. Beth Lear, candidate for the 2nd House District, decried the lack of moral courage by state leaders who raised the income tax, took a handout from Uncle Sam, and failed to reform education during the late night budget vote.

“Once again Ohio’s elected leaders failed the people. They knew what the right thing was,” Lear said Thursday. “Instead of hearing the wake-up call to focus our energy and assets on the basics of limited, constitutional government, they raised our taxes to balance their bloated budget on the backs of the people.”

Lear said the $894 million tax increase is unacceptable – especially because it is retroactive to the beginning of 2009. A retroactive tax destroys the tax planning of Ohio’s small business owners, many of whom are based in Delaware County.

“I’m especially disappointed with the Republicans who supported this tax-and-spend policy,” Lear continued. “After the last presidential election, Chairman DeWine was correct in saying the GOP is paying because it has left our conservative roots of fiscal responsibility and limited government. I will bring those values back to the state house next year.”

Implemented in 1972, the Ohio income tax has been a disaster, Lear said. Its very existence has damaged individual liberty, while facilitating the rapid growth of the public sector at all levels.

“Few people realize that spending is not free,” said Lear. “Study after study has shown that public sector spending kills jobs and creates economic woe for Ohioans. The unemployment rate rose in November to 10.6 percent. Perhaps the Democrats who supported this retroactive tax increase are trying to help Michigan inch ahead of Ohio in economic performance – that would make us 50th instead of 49th.”

Lear was raised in Delaware County, where she lives with her husband and two children. She is a former policy analyst with the Buckeye Institute for Public Policy and a long-time legislative aide. Her campaign website is www.BethLear.com.

A Real Job Creation Plan

By Marc Kilmer

While the state budget impasse remains unresolved, legislative leaders are fighting over which government programs to cut. Unfortunately, one area of state spending seems sacrosanct — corporate welfare. As long as state politicians continue to lavish money on ineffective programs like the Third Frontier or the Department of Development instead of working on real reforms to promote economic growth, Ohio’s unemployed will continue to find little relief.

With a deficit of $853 million, it seems a strange time for state policymakers to be proposing to borrow $1 billion to spend on corporate welfare. Yet this, along with Governor Ted Strickland’s recent executive order to refinance the Ohio Venture Capital Program, shows that Ohio’s politicians have learned little about job creation.

Politicians support these programs because they think they provide jobs. This reflects a mindset that is all too prevalent among those who work in Columbus (or Washington, D.C.) — an inflated view of how much the government affects the economy. Instead of viewing job creation and economic growth as the result of the daily interactions of business owners, workers, and consumers, too many politicians see it as a top-down process that can be heavily influenced by government programs.

The constant talk of the jobs “created” by the government is a symptom of this peculiar mindset. The Obama Administration, for instance, claimed its stimulus plan would create or save 3.5 million jobs. As Buckeye Institute fellow Sam Staley wrote about in a recent National Review article, though, this estimate was entirely lacking in credibility. As he pointed out, the Obama Administration estimated Ohio’s Sixth Congressional District would benefit from 7,200 stimulus jobs. Between 2001 and 2007, the area had only seen 3,500 real jobs created. It strains one’s imagination to think the stimulus bill would double the job growth occurring during the national economic boom.

In early November the Obama Administration said that 640,000 jobs had already been created or saved by the stimulus. Of course, as this claim was investigated it quickly became apparent that this was just wishful thinking. Lynn Walsh of the Buckeye Institute pointed out that many of the jobs in Ohio were created or saved in Congressional districts that didn’t even exist. The Columbus Dispatch noted that many of the education jobs claimed to be “saved” by the stimulus weren’t in danger. Other news organizations around the nation also found that local job creation claims were just as bogus.

At the state level, supporters of extending the Third Frontier program tout the 40,000 jobs it has allegedly created. While this number comes from a consulting firm and is on firmer ground than the Obama job creation numbers, it too is suspect. To truly gauge the impact of this program on employment, the analysis should determine whether these jobs would have been created without government spending. It also needs to take into account the jobs destroyed by government taking this money out of the economy through taxes and borrowing.

While Ohio politicians have been relying on the Third Frontier, the Department of Development, and other government agencies to create jobs, the state’s economy has declined. Even before the current recession, Ohio’s job growth lagged behind the national average. Where is the evidence that the top-down, corporate welfare mentality so popular in Columbus has worked?

Instead of expanding state debt and wasting more money on the Department of Development, state policymakers should enact an economic growth platform of tax reduction, ending mandatory unionization, eliminating the prevailing wage law, and cutting state bureaucracy. Ohio will once again be an economic powerhouse when its politicians recognize that the only effective government job creation program comes from creating an environment for individuals to start businesses, employ workers, and grow the economy.

Marc Kilmer is a policy analyst with the Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions, a research and educational institute located in Columbus, Ohio.

City officials joining the spending spree of congressional lawbreakers

During the March 12 Council meeting, City Manager Jim Percival called on the Council to prioritize four infrastructure improvement projects in order to apply for federal stimulus money.

Percival told the Council that on Thursday, February 19, the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission (MVRPC) asked all local jurisdictions to submit proposals to them for projects they would like to see accomplished with American Recovery & Reinvestment Act monies. At a presentation last night, they learned that 88 projects totaling almost $70 million were submitted to MVRPC and they actually only have $17.3 million to spend on highway projects. MVRPC has another $22 million to spend on transit projects. Some of that money will be coming to Greene County through Greene CATS.

He continued, saying,

Because time is of the essence in claiming these funds, the local jurisdictions were only given eight days to submit projects for consideration. Accordingly, the City of Xenia submitted four (4) projects that were deemed eligible for funding consideration. The four projects and their associated funding requests are ranked in order of priority:

Priority One: Miami Avenue Street Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvements ($186,815)

Priority Two: Cincinnati Avenue Pavement and Sidewalk Rehabilitation ($874,273)

Priority Three: Xenia Downtown Streetscape Improvement ($1,282,931)

Priority Four: Bicycle and Pedestrian Crossing Improvement from Xenia Station to Ohio Erie Trail ($51,123).

Why didn’t city administrators propose paving the city’s side streets? They could have justified it by showing how people they would need to employ to get the job done.

The federal stimulus money available to municipalities like Xenia are those funds originating from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. This is one of a number of recent lawless actions perpetrated by Congressional Democrats. It was criminal because Democrats violated an underlying law of lawmaking: giving all congressional lawmakers and the President a copy of proposed laws and time to evaluate and amend them. This underlying law is implied in Presidential review and veto clause of the Constitution as well as in the Full Faith and Credit clause. The Democrats even violated their own rules of lawmaking procedures by not making available the new 1,419 page Act 3 calendar days in advance of the vote.

The federal stimulus money being offered to local communities may be helpful but it also stolen money, which makes takers complicit in the crime. It is, moreover, a form of future taxation without representation justified by economic crisis that federal lawmakers helped to create. Besides the legal and moral issues, the stimulus money is supposed to either create or sustain jobs. How many local jobs will be created or how many threatened jobs will be saved in Xenia and elsewhere by the stolen money?

Xenia Deserves Better Schools Than Proposed By Issue 20

By Daniel Downs

I agree with the many of our city leaders that Xenia needs new schools, but not now. The fact is Ohio Schools Facilities Commission funding will still exist for school districts needing capital to build new schools. What will no longer be available is the huge pool dirty money ripped off from tobacco companies whose products clearly state that if you consume their products you might get cancer or some other related disease. I realize many people don’t care where or how the money was obtained by the state. However, when you build upon fraud and injustice, the oozing toxins of injustice eventually spread.

I also agree Xenia needs good teachers and school facilities so that students will be prepared for good paying jobs, but I have to wonder how many residents work at good paying jobs located in Xenia. Jobs paying less than $35,000 a year are not good paying jobs they are less than average. Almost two-thirds of Xenia residents have below average incomes, and a third are at or below poverty level. These people cannot afford more taxes, inflation, economic recession, or anything else that raises their cost of living.

If Issue 20 passes, Xenia taxpayers will be paying off a $79 million levy for 28 years. The author of a letter published in the Xenia Daily Gazette by the title “Give intelligent voters real facts in Xenia” noted that the high school is only 32 years old. Will administrators then decide that Xenia needs another new one in 30 years?

Besides feeling bullied by the fanatical school levy cheer leaders, the same author observed that the schools have not been properly maintained. But, how could the administrators show how badly the school district buildings need replaced if they had kept them in good repair? Just look at the school budget. It is very low, which suggests that school administrators planned for their deterioration and obsolescence. Additional proof of this is present by one of the Xenia’s well-paid official cheerleaders, who wrote that the permanent improvement levy of $400,000 a year has not been enough to keep Xenia’s 10 school buildings in good repair. Gee, I thought it was an addition to the then maintenance budget and not meant to be the only funding source for maintaining good and healthy school buildings for the benefit of all of Xenia’s children.

A more important concern is whether the $79 million will result in better education. Ohio law requires the building of small schools—like many small neighborhood schools—while at the same time permitting large schools that the law acknowledges are ineffective learning environments. Although many Xenia High School’s 900+ students demonstrate exceptional achievement levels, students in other schools like Warner are not doing so well. Maybe it’s because those schools have too many students to be effective. Surely, people do not believe children from middle- and low-income home are learning somehow deficient (dumb)? As proven by education research, small schools are key to student achievement. The plan to combine schools into even larger units will not produce better prepared students.

The Xenia School Facilities Plan (Issue 20) is about getting money and not what is best for Xenia’s kids or the future of the community. Xenia taxpayers and parents of school children should demand the best educational environment their tax dollars can buy. That is another reason why Xenia should not vote for Issue 20.

My research of the Xenia School Facilities Plan includes:
Future of Xenia Under One Roof?

Xenia Community Schools Rebuilding Plan: What I Learned at the Forum

Xenia Community Schools Rebuilding Plan: Why Small Schools Are Best

Xenia Community Schools Rebuilding Plan: It’s All About the Money